In response to the shocking revelation of comments by Canada’s Minister of State for Science and Technology on evolution.
(see here for some great response from the research community)
To the office of the Prime Minister of Canada:
As a student in scientific field, I wish to express the deep concern I felt reading about Minister Goodyear’s comments on a central fact of scientific knowledge – evolution. I was disappointed to learn that the man in charge of scientific development in this country is so deeply ignorant of his domain. The fact is that evolution is a central pillar of many avenues of scientific research today – from biomedical advances which increase our ability of understand and fight diseases, to even seemingly unrelated fields such as my own – artificial intelligence – where concepts of evolution have been adapted into successful computational techniques. Far from being a controversial issue, as some dishonest partisans imply, there is no controversy amongst scientists; Evolution is a fact, and an important one.
Moreover, it is confusing that the Minister would frame the question as a matter of belief in the first place – evolution is the result of overwhelming evidence and consistent data from a wide array of research avenues. To frame the issue as one of personal belief or even as a matter of religious freedom is to miss the point entirely, and suggests a frightening lack of understanding on the Minister’s part.
To have the Minister of Science be so ignorant of a central fact of scientific knowledge is absurd – as absurd as if the Finance Minister did not “believe” in supply-and-demand, or if the Minister of Defense did not “believe” in the existence of Iraq. How can Canada hope to remain relevant and competitive as a location for research if those in charge are so incompetent? As a student looking towards graduate school, such revelations about our country’s leadership make me seriously question whether I wish to continue my studies in Canada, or go elsewhere.
I sincerely hope that further clarifications will be made on the Minister’s stance on this issue and that, if it his found that he is as ignorant as his previous comments suggest, a more suitable replacement will be found.
Beyond the comments on evolution, I am further concerned that the minister hinted at an approach the research focusing on commercial applications. Such a focus on research that will sell will harm the research community in Canada; pure research is important and valuable, and it should not be the domain of the government to decide which avenues are likely to be the most profitable.
Sincerely,
Nicholas FitzGerald
So, will you be acknowledging Goodyear’s affirmation of belief in evolution any time soon?
Or would the facts just spoil your fun?
“We are evolving every year, every decade. That’s a fact, whether it is to the intensity of the sun, whether it is to, as a chiropractor, walking on cement versus anything else, whether it is running shoes or high heels, of course we are evolving to our environment.”
Does that strike you as a comment made by someone who understands the theory of evolution? Besides the issue isn’t really whether he “believes” it or not… the issue is that he even characterized it as a question of belief! He was asked a question about science, and he responded with an answer about religion… does that strike you as appropriate behaviour for a Minister of Science?
I’d almost say that the stunning inability to explain the theory of evolution is almost as bad as thinking its the devil’s work. If Jim Flaherty explained that the economy was first an issue of personal religious convictions, and then backpedaled with economics is “just people buying and selling products every day”, would we consider that to be a sufficient understanding for a finance minister? So why is it alright for a science minister to have such a stunningly weak understanding of basic science?